Determinan Rendahnya Utilisasi Kartu Loyalitas pada UMKM Kuliner

Authors

  • Muhammad Rivaldi Mandini Nugraha Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Pariwisata - Yapari, Indonesia
  • Adrian Agoes STIEPAR YAPARI BANDUNG, Indonesia
  • Septy Indrianty Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Pariwisata - Yapari, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32659/jmp.v5i2.736

Keywords:

loyalty card, symbolic adoption, low utilization, customer domicile, measurement validity, culinary SMEs

Abstract

This study identifies the determinants of low loyalty card utilization in culinary SMEs, emphasizing the role of customer domicile. Although 50% of 76 respondents owned a Memanja Rasa loyalty card, three months of field observation revealed no stamping occurred. Zero stamping does not imply zero repeat purchases: stamping required a single transaction of at least IDR 150,000, a threshold that structurally decouples visit frequency from reward accumulation. A mixed-methods explanatory sequential design was employed. Quantitative data were analyzed using ordinal regression, Spearman correlation, Mann-Whitney U test, and cross-tabulation by domicile; qualitative data were obtained through participatory observation. Results show that service quality significantly affects loyalty (p = 0.003; OR = 19.67), whereas CRM is not significant (p = 0.123) despite a very strong correlation (rs = 0.933). Cross-tabulation reveals a geographic paradox: local Bandung adoption is lowest (4.8%), while out-of-town Jakarta (73.7%) and Depok (83.3%) are much higher. Cardholders reported higher loyalty scores (U = 71.5; p < 0.001; r = 0.797), including repeat purchase behavior, yet none ever stamped their cards. This indicates that stamping is an invalid proxy for repeat purchase when the reward threshold is structurally misaligned with transaction patterns. Four determinant categories were identified: (1) program design, with the threshold as the primary structural determinant; (2) customer characteristics (domicile, self-selection bias, attitude–behavior gap); (3) operational factors (monitoring, staff incentives, socialization); and (4) contextual factors (competition, visit patterns). This study contributes to the loyalty program literature by introducing symbolic adoption, demonstrating the measurement invalidity of stamping as a loyalty proxy, and emphasizing the importance of measuring utilization rather than mere adoption. It corrects methodological assumptions in the literature. A diagnostic framework is offered for SMEs to design more effective loyalty programs. These findings confirm that loyalty program success should be measured by utilization, not adoption alone.

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

Buttle, F., & Maklan, S. (2019). Customer relationship management: Concepts and technologies (4th ed.). Routledge.

Dorotic, M., Bijmolt, T. H. A., & Verhoef, P. C. (2012). Loyalty programmes: Current knowledge and research directions. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(3), 217–237.

Edison, E., Anwar, Y., & Komariyah, I. (2020). Manajemen sumber daya manusia. Alfabeta.

Feldman, J. M., & Lynch, J. G. (1988). Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(3), 421–435.

Hasan, A. (2020). Marketing dan kepuasan pelanggan: Kajian teori dan praktik. Deepublish.

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15th ed.). Pearson.

Liu, Y. (2007). The long-term impact of loyalty programs on consumer purchase behavior and loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 71(4), 19–35.

Meyer-Waarden, L. (2008). The influence of loyalty programme membership on customer purchase behaviour. European Journal of Marketing, 42(1/2), 87–114.

Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460–469.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.

Roscoe, J. T. (1975). Fundamental research statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Sheeran, P. (2002). Intention–behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. European Review of Social Psychology, 12(1), 1–36.

Swanson, K. K., & Horridge, P. E. (2006). Travel motivations as souvenir purchase indicators. Tourism Management, 27(4), 671–683.

Tjiptono, F. (2019). Strategi pemasaran: Prinsip dan penerapan. Andi Offset.

Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-30

How to Cite

Mandini Nugraha, M. R., Agoes, A., & Indrianty, S. (2026). Determinan Rendahnya Utilisasi Kartu Loyalitas pada UMKM Kuliner. Manajemen Dan Pariwisata, 5(2), 188–207. https://doi.org/10.32659/jmp.v5i2.736

Citation Check

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.