Pengukuran Daya Saing Kampung Wisata di Kota Bandung

Authors

  • Taufiq Hidayat Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Pariwisata YAPARI Bandung, Indonesia
  • Arisman Muhtar Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Pariwisata YAPARI Bandung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32659/tsj.v9i2.333

Keywords:

Competitiveness, Tourist Villages, Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA)

Abstract

The success of a tourist destination in the world market cannot be separated from the influence of its competitiveness. The competitiveness of tourist destinations is an area that attracts the attention of tourism researchers. Tourism competitiveness has tremendous consequences for the tourism industry and is therefore of great interest to practitioners and policy makers. The approach to the competitiveness of tourist destinations has so far focused on the image or attractiveness of tourist destinations concentrating on attributes that are considered to attract visitors, such as climate, scenery and accommodation. There are various indicators used to measure the competitiveness index of tourist destinations, including those from the World Travel and Tourism Council (WWTC), which include the Human Tourism Indicator, Price Competitiveness Indicator, Infrastructure Development Indicator, Environment Indicator, Technology Advancement Indicator, Human Resources Indicator, Openness Indicator, Social Development Indicators. In general, these indicators are relatively general and not local specific in exploring the conditions and circumstances of a tourist attraction, even though this aspect is directly related to the conditions of a destination/tourist attraction. The aim of this research is to assess destination performance using indicators in the aspects of attractions/tourism objects, infrastructure, access, and services/management. In this study, data came from 50 tourists (n=50). The analysis used is the Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) Model to create a ranking of various attributes of Tourism Villages which concerns 4 aspects, namely tourist attractions, facilities (amenities), access/affordability (access), and services. additional (ancillary), by analyzing which attributes have a level of correspondence between the level of importance and the level of performance. Based on the results of the analysis, the main indicators that must be improved are additional services, and attractions are still felt to not meet respondents' expectations. The management of Braga Tourism Village needs to improve the quality of its services, especially related to information services and cleaning staff, while the quality of services which are considered to be good needs to be maintained in order to provide comfort for visitors. The results obtained from Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) will be used to determine the right strategy to improve the company's performance.

References

Annisa, Lusiana, M., dan Hutasoit, G. (2018). Pengaruh Daya Saing Destinasi Wisata Terhadap Implementasi Re-Visiting Commitmen Wisatawan Objek Wisata di Kota Palembang. Jurnal Manajemen Dewantara, Volume 1 Nomor 2 Desember 2018.

Chon, K. S., Weaver, P. A., & Kim, C. Y. (1991). Marketing your community: Image analysis in Norfolk. The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 31(4), 24–27.

Damanik, Darwin, dan Elidawaty Purba. (2020). Analisis Daya Saing Sektor Pariwisata Di Kabupaten Simalungun. EKUILNOMI: Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, Vol. 2 No. 2 Nov 2020.

Gallarza, M. G., Saura, I. G., & Garc?´a, H.C.(2002).Destination image towards a conceptual framework. Annals of Tourism Research, 29(1), 56–72.

Hu, Y.Z., & Ritchie, J.R.B.(1993).Measuring destination attractiveness: A contextual approach. Journal of Travel Research, 32(2), 25–35.

Murdy, S., & Pike, S. (2012). Perceptions of visitor relationship marketing opportunities by destination marketers: An importance-performance analysis. Tourism Management, 33(5), 1281-1285.

Murphy, P., Pritchard, M. P., & Smith, B. (2000). The destination product and its impact on traveller perceptions. Tourism Management, 21(1), 43–52.

Pratiwi, I. W., & Hendrawan, D. (2018). Implementasi importance-performance analysis (ipa): analisis preferensi konsumen muda mie setan malang. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 6(2), 1-20.

Ritchie, J.R.B., & Crouch, G.I.(2000).The competitive destination: A sustainability perspective. Tourism Management, 21(1), 1–7.

Saputra, B., & Savitri, D. (2020). Penerapan Metode Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) Untuk Menganalisis Kinerja Suroboyo Bus Sebagai Moda Transportasi Umum Berdasarkan Tingkat Kepuasan Pengguna. MATHunesa: Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika, 8(3), 239-253.

Trisnawati, Rina, Wiyadi, dan Edy Priyono. 2018. Analisa Daya Saing Industri Pariwisata Untuk Meningkatkan Ekonomi Daerah: (Kajian Perbandingan Daya Saing Pariwisata antara Surakarta dengan Yogyakarta). Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan. 13(2). https://doi.org/10.20885/ejem.v13i2.224

Valiollahpour, Morteza, Sahar Valiollahpour, Farshid Hasannejad, Seyedeh Maryam Hosseini, Saman Akhavan Niaki. 2014. New Approach to Strategy at the Diamond Model Based on Competitiveness. International Journal of Scientific Management and Development, Vol. 2 (6),213 -220 June (2014).

Wibowo, Sukarno dan Hidayat, N, M. 2017. Daya Saing Destinasi Pariwisata Kota Bandung Di Era Asean Economic Community (Aec). Barista, Volume 4, Nomor 2, Desember 2017.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-11

How to Cite

Hidayat, T., & Muhtar, A. (2024). Pengukuran Daya Saing Kampung Wisata di Kota Bandung. Tourism Scientific Journal, 9(2), 188–199. https://doi.org/10.32659/tsj.v9i2.333

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.